We Asked 10 Chefs: What’s The Weirdest Dish Modification Request You’ve Received?

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get kitchen staples and gadgets delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

VinePair asked 10 chefs to recall the strangest dish modifications they had received, including requests involving marshmallow fluff, unusual cooking methods and extensive ingredient restrictions. The report is a collection of chefs’ anecdotes, not a survey of restaurant orders; it does not establish how common such requests are.

VinePair has published a collection of 10 chefs’ accounts of the strangest dish modifications they say customers have requested, ranging from marshmallow fluff on steak to a well-done version of steak tartare. The report offers a set of firsthand anecdotes about restaurant service and kitchen improvisation, but does not measure how often such requests occur across the industry.

The examples span requests to change ingredients, preparation methods, portion details and even the presentation of a dish. Mark Bucher, co-owner of Medium Rare, recalled a family bringing its own marshmallow fluff and asking staff to put it on the children’s steak, fries and salad. He also described customers asking for steak cooked in a deep fryer. Those accounts illustrate how modifications can move beyond familiar requests such as removing an ingredient or changing a side.

Other chefs described combinations that required substantial kitchen adjustments. Tyler Murray, chef at Millstone in Lexington, Kentucky, said a guest asked to have a smoked prime rib sandwich combined with a farmhouse salad. The kitchen chopped the sandwich ingredients and salad together, then used horseradish aioli as dressing. Haley Duren, executive chef at Long Count in New York City, said a guest wanted an oyster mushroom sandwich without frying. She roasted its ingredients instead, a method she said took about 30 minutes, compared with less than three minutes for the usual preparation.

Some requests raised questions about whether a dish could be prepared as described. Adam Plitt, executive chef of Delmonico’s Hospitality Group, recalled a request for well-done steak tartare, a dish traditionally served raw. He said the kitchen tried to retain its flavors, while acknowledging that the result was no longer really steak tartare. A separate account described a customer asking for a flat iron steak cooked half rare and half well done without cutting it in half; the guest later agreed to order another dish.

Where Guest Requests Meet Kitchen Limits

The anecdotes show the balancing act between accommodating diners and maintaining a dish’s preparation, timing and safety. Some requests may be manageable substitutions, while others can require a different cooking method or make the named dish something else. Duren’s account gives one concrete example of the operational cost: roasting ingredients for a sandwich took far longer than the restaurant’s standard fried preparation.

Requests involving allergies also carry a different kind of responsibility from preferences. Clinton Snowling, vice president of culinary operations at Parched Hospitality Group, described a guest who requested ingredient packaging to check for allergens and cited citrus and greens allergies. His account also included requests to grind a ribeye for a burger and replace fries with salad. The report does not independently verify the details or establish the guest’s medical needs, but it points to why kitchens must distinguish between a preference and a request that requires careful ingredient handling.

For readers, the stories are a snapshot of the unseen work behind ordering off a menu. They also underline that a restaurant may not be able to fulfill every modification safely, practically or as requested. The chefs’ stories are personal recollections, not evidence that unusual orders are representative of diners overall.

From Routine Substitutions to Remakes

VinePair frames the report around a routine feature of restaurant service: staff handle requests such as flagging allergens, changing a side or leaving out raw onions. The chefs’ examples depart from those common adjustments in different ways. Some ask for a familiar food to be prepared by an unconventional method; others combine two menu items or impose multiple restrictions on ingredients.

The report identifies chefs and restaurant operators from several locations, including New York City, Lexington, Kentucky, and West Palm Beach, Florida. Its list includes a request for a prime rib sandwich mixed into a salad, an egg-white omelet described as vegan, tuna tartare cooked well done, a Caesar salad without lettuce, exactly seven fries, and a hamburger that was not on the menu. The source material does not provide full details or chef quotations for every item on that list, so those entries cannot be expanded into independently verified accounts.

““A family brought their own marshmallow fluff and asked us to put it on everything their kids ate, including the steak, fries, and salad.””

— Mark Bucher, co-owner of Medium Rare

What the Anecdotes Cannot Show

The report does not state when each request occurred, provide records of the orders, or explain how the chefs were selected. It is based on recollections attributed to restaurant professionals, and the accounts have not been independently corroborated in the supplied material. The report also offers no denominator or comparison data, so it cannot show whether these requests are rare, becoming more common or typical of any particular kind of restaurant.

Several items in the report’s summary list are not accompanied in the supplied source material by detailed explanations or attributable quotations. It is also unclear how each restaurant handled every request, whether any were declined, or what food-safety procedures were used where allergies or changes to raw dishes were involved. Those details should not be inferred from the anecdotes.

No Follow-Up Is Specified

VinePair’s report presents the chefs’ recollections as a completed collection; the supplied material does not announce a follow-up, new survey or planned industry response. Readers can take the accounts as examples of the kinds of requests individual chefs say they have encountered, not as a forecast of restaurant trends.

For anyone making a restaurant request, the practical next step is to describe allergies clearly and ask staff whether a change can be made safely. Whether a kitchen can alter a dish, and how long that takes, depends on the ingredients, preparation and restaurant. The report does not say whether any of the featured restaurants have changed their menus or policies as a result of these requests.

Key Questions

What is the report about?

VinePair asked 10 chefs to describe unusual dish modifications they said restaurant guests had requested. The examples include unconventional ingredient combinations, cooking instructions and substitutions.

Which request did Mark Bucher recall?

Bucher, co-owner of Medium Rare, said a family brought marshmallow fluff and asked staff to put it on the children’s steak, fries and salad. He also recalled guests asking for steak cooked in a deep fryer.

Why did a well-done steak tartare stand out?

Steak tartare is traditionally served raw. Adam Plitt said the kitchen tried to capture the dish’s flavors, while noting that cooking it well done meant it was no longer really steak tartare.

Does the report show that these requests are common?

No. It collects 10 chefs’ anecdotes but provides no industry-wide survey, order totals or comparison data showing how often unusual modifications happen.

What should diners do when they have an allergy?

Tell the restaurant clearly about the allergy and ask staff whether they can accommodate it safely. The anecdotes do not describe the restaurants’ specific allergen procedures, and a kitchen may not be able to fulfill every request.

Source: rss